Search found 468 matches
- Tue Nov 29, 2016 3:08 am
- Forum: Looking for import filters...
- Topic: Biorxiv
- Replies: 12
- Views: 59153
Re: Biorxiv
There is a direct bookends compatible RIS output in Citation Tools, e.g. http://biorxiv.org/highwire/citation/25230/bookends — possibly there is a compatibility issue with the abstract, requiring a small edit of the RIS import filter but give it a try first. Jon has also improved Biorxiv import dire...
- Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:13 pm
- Forum: Bookends
- Topic: Feature request: Bib sync
- Replies: 30
- Views: 22730
Re: Feature request: Bib sync
I thought this file watching utility may be potentially helpful for you guys: https://github.com/emcrisostomo/fswatch But looking at the database.BDB and database.BDB.JOURNAL files and they don't update when edits are made, so you can't use file changes to automatically trigger the update Applescrip...
- Sat Sep 03, 2016 10:03 pm
- Forum: Bookends
- Topic: [Feature Request] Highlight Searched for text in PDF view
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3510
Re: [Feature Request] Highlight Searched for text in PDF view
Dear Jon, thanks for considering this!!!
- Thu Sep 01, 2016 10:37 pm
- Forum: Bookends
- Topic: How to make quick spotlight search "live"?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 28658
How to make quick spotlight search "live"?
Hi, I would like to set up the quick search that for spotlight it is also "live" (no need to press enter). To user manual states it isn't live for performance reasons, but my searches after pressing enter are faster than I can easily perceive, and this must depend on the age of the machine...
- Thu Sep 01, 2016 10:31 pm
- Forum: Bookends
- Topic: [Feature Request] Highlight Searched for text in PDF view
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3510
[Feature Request] Highlight Searched for text in PDF view
If I use the Spotlight quick search, the PDF results can be displayed in the attachments panel. In Scrivener and Papers, when your search includes a PDF it also highlights the searched for term within the PDF panel (and scrolls to the first match): Screenshot 2016-09-02 10.27.43.png It would be nice...
- Thu Sep 01, 2016 10:23 pm
- Forum: Bookends
- Topic: Feature request: Bib sync
- Replies: 30
- Views: 22730
Re: Feature request: Bib sync
Dellu: OK, I suspect you are visualising your PDF constantly as you write, so you need your .BIB file to be up-to-date continuously. I think the Applescript route is the only way to go, it seems much less trouble than dealing with duplicates. Don't forget you can use many different apps to assign ke...
- Thu Sep 01, 2016 9:59 pm
- Forum: Bookends
- Topic: [Feature Request] Better Support for Pandoc Citations
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4179
Re: [Feature Request] Better Support for Pandoc Citations
I think it is unfeasible for Jon to support the two formats, and although it would be great to be able to transform between the two, it will probably require a third-party text processing script/tool. I think Bookends supports the applescript necessary to find the references and get back the informa...
- Thu Sep 01, 2016 2:10 am
- Forum: Bookends
- Topic: [Feature Request] Better Support for Pandoc Citations
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4179
Re: [Feature Request] Better Support for Pandoc Citations
Yes OK agreed, this would be very non-trivial to implement the full feature set. I wonder how/if Papers 3 deal with this (they support the temporary citation, but no idea about the scanning)?
- Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:52 am
- Forum: Bookends
- Topic: [Feature Request] Better Support for Pandoc Citations
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4179
[Feature Request] Better Support for Pandoc Citations
Pandoc[1] is an excellent text processing engine which integrates into many different workflows. For Scrivener users it offers more powerful features than MMD alone. We can use a custom format (Pandoc = `@`u1) and settings in BE preferences (use [] for temporary citations) to generate temporary cita...
- Mon Aug 29, 2016 11:03 pm
- Forum: Bookends
- Topic: Scrivener, Bookends & LaTeX
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5633
Re: Scrivener, Bookends & LaTeX
Yes, there are multiple routes to generate a bibliography in the Scrivener > MMD > LaTeX route: Use standard BE temporary citations and scan the .md file using Bookends. Use MMD style citations and transform then to BibLaTex format. LaTeX does the formatting. Use Pandoc and pandoc-citeproc to scan t...
- Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:18 am
- Forum: Bookends
- Topic: [Feature Request] Support Markdown formatting of Bibliography
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7464
- Wed Aug 24, 2016 10:03 pm
- Forum: Bookends
- Topic: [Feature Request] Support Markdown formatting of Bibliography
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7464
Re: [Feature Request] Support Markdown formatting of Bibliography
OK, proofreading scan should do 99.48% of the heavy lifting, great! Is there a reason not to let the proofreading scan also change the delimiters?
- Wed Aug 24, 2016 10:21 am
- Forum: Bookends
- Topic: [Feature Request] Support Markdown formatting of Bibliography
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7464
Re: [Feature Request] Support Markdown formatting of Bibliography
Jon would your scanning code be able to deal with unterminated blocks? What I mean is that << could be used by people in normal text without the matching closing >>, which may cause bookends to read in a large text chunk. Also blocks of code (aka computer science papers) could falsely trigger using ...
- Mon Aug 22, 2016 12:35 am
- Forum: Bookends
- Topic: Feature request: Bib sync
- Replies: 30
- Views: 22730
Re: Feature request: Bib sync
Yes why are you exporting to Bibdesk at all (which is where you say your duplicates are being created), once you have a .BIB file exported from Bookends, you don't need Bibdesk?
- Mon Aug 22, 2016 12:11 am
- Forum: Bookends
- Topic: [Feature Request] Support Markdown formatting of Bibliography
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7464
Re: [Feature Request] Support Markdown formatting of Bibliography
Most of the standard symbols are used in LaTeX[1] : + - = ! / ( ) [ ] < > | ' : \ { } $ _ ^ and the tilde and asterisk used by markdown. I suppose the « » could be an option, but this would conflict with non-English quoting. The section symbol § probably doesn't conflict with anything, but would lo...