thoughts on a Series field (with glossary)

A place for users to ask each other questions, make suggestions, and discuss Bookends.
Post Reply
danzac
Posts: 433
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 11:45 am

thoughts on a Series field (with glossary)

Post by danzac »

I think Jon and I have discussed this before, but using refbase.org has got me thinking again about a Series field that is attached to the glossary — or to its own glossary. I am starting to like this idea more and more. One of the main reasons I like it is that it would be ideal for the "journal" field (the one which has the glossary) to hold book titles for book chapters. For many of us, this cannot be the practice because series titles have abbreviations an therefore we place series titles into the journal field.
~I swore to myself that if I ever got to walk around the room as manager people would laugh as they saw me coming and applaud as I walked away~
Post Reply