References Within a Reference: Check the reference list for ibid. or op. cit. These refer to a previous reference and should be eliminated from the reference section. In text, repeat the earlier reference number and renumber the reference section accordingly. If the ibid. gives a new page number, or other information, use the following forms:
[3, Th. 1]; [3, Lemma 2]; [3, pp. 5-10]; [3, eq. (2)]; [3, Fig. 1]; [3, Appendix I]; [3, Sec. 4.5]; [3, Ch. 2, pp. 5-10]; [3, Algorithm 5].
Page numbers for numbered citations
Page numbers for numbered citations
The built in support for citations which are numbered, such as for IEEE, does not seem to allow page numbers to be added using the @123 syntax. I have been able to use the escape style though (/ p. 123/). It would be nice to be able to use the @syntax as it is something required for multiple references to the same document, from the IEEE style guide,:
Re: Page numbers for numbered citations
You use the backslash for quoted text: \ p. 123\
Jon
Sonny Software
Jon
Sonny Software
Re: Page numbers for numbered citations
Hi John,
yes I used the wrong slashes (as I said I've confirmed it works) but my question was really about the @ syntax for page numbers.
Best,
Peter.
yes I used the wrong slashes (as I said I've confirmed it works) but my question was really about the @ syntax for page numbers.
Best,
Peter.
Re: Page numbers for numbered citations
It's important that it be correct if others see this thread and want to use that construction.
Actually, it would be complicated to implement. I don't see any significant advantage of @ over \literal text\ in this case.
Jon
Sonny Software
Actually, it would be complicated to implement. I don't see any significant advantage of @ over \literal text\ in this case.
Jon
Sonny Software
Re: Page numbers for numbered citations
Fair enough.It's important that it be correct if others see this thread and want to use that construction.
OK. I'm not that invested in using the @ notation I really just wanted to know if I was missing something.Actually, it would be complicated to implement. I don't see any significant advantage of @ over \literal text\ in this case.
Thanks for explaining your position on supporting @ for numbered citations.