Hello all,
Quick query about what would be best:
Occasionally, a Journal article might be spread out over 2/3 sections.
In other words, starts at 33-46 – and then continues further at 89-96.
In such situations – what would the impact be of placing [33-46, 89-96] inside the [Pages] field?
Any suggestions?
Best practice for non-continuous page numbering in Journals?
Re: Best practice for non-continuous page numbering in Journals?
You can do that, but in the format just tell Bookends to output the pages (p), not the page range (p-).
Alternatively, you can put a comma after the "pages", which tells Bookends to output the field as is, i.e.
[33-46, 89-96],
Jon
Sonny Software
Alternatively, you can put a comma after the "pages", which tells Bookends to output the field as is, i.e.
[33-46, 89-96],
Jon
Sonny Software