After much grief and suffering, I have completely given up on writing directly in DEVONthink. I do love the software, but only for the semantic cataloging and search. "See also" is both genius and invaluable. But the interface for DT is a bear, and there's just way too much overhead for me to get notes out of my head and into DEVONthink. Small, lightweight, specific apps for the capture process allows me to avoid distraction/frustration with DEVONthink.thecritic wrote:Why you wouldn't take notes directly in DEVONThink?terceiro wrote:3. A nicely formatted export with plenty of options, so I can get the quotes, summaries, comments, and notes into my word processor or DEVONthik database
When it's time to stop the reading and get to producing, I'll export the notes from whatever I'm using for notes at the time (I've used OmniOutliner, Mori, Journler, Notational Velocity, text files, long word processing documents, and pencil-and-paper in the past), I'll export them as individual notes into DEVONthink. The goal, of course, is to get the benefits that Stephen Johnson mentioned in a blog post a couple of years ago.
The benefit I can see to SlipBox is the metadata fields built-in. They allow me to immediately forget about being consistent and instead just focus on getting the note down. Otherwise, I spend too much of my limited brainpower worrying about keeping things regular.
Too much work? Perhaps. But it's a workflow that [|seems to be] work[s|ing] for me (fingers crossed). I'm embracing my idiosyncrasies.