I really think that the "Replicate as Book chapter" is a great new option. Congratulations!
However:
1. I used this command on a book entry in my database, for which I had already created some bookchapers as separate entries. The funny result was that Bookends opened a reference window, but not the newly created reference with empty title field but the alphabetically first reference of the previously entered book-chapter referencess from this work.
2. As it is now, "Replicate as Book chapter" creates a new reference, book chapter style, where the title has been transferred to the "book title" field correctly, but the author is still in the author field. The Book Author in a multi-author book however should be moved to the "Editor" field.
Best regards
Hans-Reinhard
Replicate as book chapter
Re: Replicate as book chapter
I can't reproduce this. You mean you selected the book entry again and used Replicate As Book Chapter and an existing reference was shown in the reference window? If so, or something else unexpected happened, please contact me directly with instructions on how to reproduce this.hareiko wrote: 1. I used this command on a book entry in my database, for which I had already created some bookchapers as separate entries. The funny result was that Bookends opened a reference window, but not the newly created reference with empty title field but the alphabetically first reference of the previously entered book-chapter referencess from this work.
That's the right behavior. A book entry is by one or more authors. If you have a collection that was edited by a group but for which each chapter has a different authors that should be an Edited Book type.2. As it is now, "Replicate as Book chapter" creates a new reference, book chapter style, where the title has been transferred to the "book title" field correctly, but the author is still in the author field. The Book Author in a multi-author book however should be moved to the "Editor" field.
Jon
Sonny Software