Keyword management
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:02 pm
I wonder what people think about these two proposals to revise keyword management. I think the way it works now requires too many operations to accomplish simple stuff (such as removing or renaming a keyword, or even assigning keywords).
I present minimalist and maximalist proposals. The minimalist simply revises the Extra/Term Lists/Keywords to make it easier to work with keywords in the existing framework. The maximalist would make keywords act like groups and would allow managing keywords through the Groups Pane (now renamed Keywords and Groups pane?)
MINIMALIST
The current window has two modes: one (I'll call it action mode) shows the keywords and four actions (find, update, etc); the other mode ("exploration mode") is activated with a tiny arrow and shows the entries for each keyword. I think that the division in the two modes is artificial. The user probably needs (I do for sure) to perform actions but after exploring the entries or even after accessing the entries, which is much better accomplished in the "Exploration" mode. Also, the set of actions is rather limited. So my suggestions are:
1) Put the four actions (find, update, etc) in the toolbar (as icons or buttons), so that a user can perform these actions in either mode.
2) Make the tiny arrow (that switches between modes) more visible in the toolbar, probably an icon such as in the List View.
3) Expand the set of actions to:
-- rename Keyword (two slow clicks as is common in OSX?)
-- delete Keyword
-- Perhaps have a "search" action (in addition to Find) to avoid creating a new hits list but simply showing results in the List View.
-- I find the double clicking action confusing (it assigns the keyword to the currently selected entry). I propose instead to either perform a search (as described above) or activate the other mode.
MAXIMALIST
Make keywords behave like groups. In fact, the Groups pane can transform into a sort of iTunes-like collection pane: Library, Hits, Groups, Keywords (each with collapsing arrows).
Keywords in this way would behave like groups. You can delete & rename them directly from the pane, drag entries to the keyword, etc etc
Some may say that one can use Groups to this end, but groups serve (at least in my use) to the purpose of building collections (e.g. refereces useful to prepare a certain class; references I'm using for a certain article; etc), which are intrinsically different from Keyword management.
Besides iTunes, I can think of Bibdesk as having an approach to managing keywords that is similar to my proposal (although I haven't used bibdesk for a very long time now, I don't think they have changed this feature).
PS-- I see that by mistake I didn't add the option to vote for the "maximalist" proposal...
I present minimalist and maximalist proposals. The minimalist simply revises the Extra/Term Lists/Keywords to make it easier to work with keywords in the existing framework. The maximalist would make keywords act like groups and would allow managing keywords through the Groups Pane (now renamed Keywords and Groups pane?)
MINIMALIST
The current window has two modes: one (I'll call it action mode) shows the keywords and four actions (find, update, etc); the other mode ("exploration mode") is activated with a tiny arrow and shows the entries for each keyword. I think that the division in the two modes is artificial. The user probably needs (I do for sure) to perform actions but after exploring the entries or even after accessing the entries, which is much better accomplished in the "Exploration" mode. Also, the set of actions is rather limited. So my suggestions are:
1) Put the four actions (find, update, etc) in the toolbar (as icons or buttons), so that a user can perform these actions in either mode.
2) Make the tiny arrow (that switches between modes) more visible in the toolbar, probably an icon such as in the List View.
3) Expand the set of actions to:
-- rename Keyword (two slow clicks as is common in OSX?)
-- delete Keyword
-- Perhaps have a "search" action (in addition to Find) to avoid creating a new hits list but simply showing results in the List View.
-- I find the double clicking action confusing (it assigns the keyword to the currently selected entry). I propose instead to either perform a search (as described above) or activate the other mode.
MAXIMALIST
Make keywords behave like groups. In fact, the Groups pane can transform into a sort of iTunes-like collection pane: Library, Hits, Groups, Keywords (each with collapsing arrows).
Keywords in this way would behave like groups. You can delete & rename them directly from the pane, drag entries to the keyword, etc etc
Some may say that one can use Groups to this end, but groups serve (at least in my use) to the purpose of building collections (e.g. refereces useful to prepare a certain class; references I'm using for a certain article; etc), which are intrinsically different from Keyword management.
Besides iTunes, I can think of Bibdesk as having an approach to managing keywords that is similar to my proposal (although I haven't used bibdesk for a very long time now, I don't think they have changed this feature).
PS-- I see that by mistake I didn't add the option to vote for the "maximalist" proposal...