A different(?) question regarding Repeated Citations
Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 4:19 pm
Hello All,
Anyone know what exactly BE12 looks for, in order to be able to apply the "For Repeated Citations Use______" field?
By this I mean, if I have the following references:-
Fn 1) {Du Toit et al blah blah 213}
Fn 2) {Du Toit et al blah blah 214}
etc.
In the above scenario, BE12 correctly replaces FN2 with ibid or whatever I have selected.
But what about the following situation:-
Fn1) {Du Toit et al blah blah 213}. For a contrary argument, see {Blaauw & De Vos blah blah 1092}.
Fn2) {Du Toit et al blah blah 214}
Presently, BE12 also changes the latter fn2 to ibid - however, I would not want this behaviour, since whereas {Du Toit} was cited in fn1, technically, there was a 2nd reference {Blaauw & De Vos} between {Du Toit@fn1} and {Du Toit@fn2}...
I hope I am making sense. Is there a particular manner in which I might need to organise {Du Toit} and {Blaauw & De Vos} in fn1, in order for BE12 to "see" the intervening reference, and thereby NOT apply ibid to fn2?
Any ideas?
Anyone know what exactly BE12 looks for, in order to be able to apply the "For Repeated Citations Use______" field?
By this I mean, if I have the following references:-
Fn 1) {Du Toit et al blah blah 213}
Fn 2) {Du Toit et al blah blah 214}
etc.
In the above scenario, BE12 correctly replaces FN2 with ibid or whatever I have selected.
But what about the following situation:-
Fn1) {Du Toit et al blah blah 213}. For a contrary argument, see {Blaauw & De Vos blah blah 1092}.
Fn2) {Du Toit et al blah blah 214}
Presently, BE12 also changes the latter fn2 to ibid - however, I would not want this behaviour, since whereas {Du Toit} was cited in fn1, technically, there was a 2nd reference {Blaauw & De Vos} between {Du Toit@fn1} and {Du Toit@fn2}...
I hope I am making sense. Is there a particular manner in which I might need to organise {Du Toit} and {Blaauw & De Vos} in fn1, in order for BE12 to "see" the intervening reference, and thereby NOT apply ibid to fn2?
Any ideas?