Workflow question
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 12:48 pm
I am in the middle of a project that involves a large number of references, and I'm looking for a better kind of organization. So far, I've been taking notes in Scrivener, and writing the text in Scrivener too. Problem is that means the notes are organized (relatively) linearly, and contained within a particular project file. I recently downloaded a trial of DEVONthink. This has the ability to import references from BookEnds, but it appears not to import keywords data, which seems very odd to me. I tried indexing around 9,000 pdfs, but DEVONthink was able to generate only 16 tags, and it tagged less than 100 of the files! So much for machine intelligence. 
I've also created notes within BookEnds. I like the ability to copy text from a pdf into the note stream, especially to create citations. However, I find that these notes disappear into the database and I lose track of them. Most of the 11,000 references were imported from another bibliography program, and so they have a note documenting this import. That means it makes no sense for me to search for only those references that have notes.
In addition, I've been using Scapple to create my own visual summaries of important areas of the literature. This works pretty well, but I would like to add some kind of automation. At the moment I'm simply searching for references on keyword, to try to see what I've forgotten about.
I guess my fantasy is to generate some kind of semantic network based on the keywords I've assigned in BookEnds. How do other BooksEnds users handle this kind of problem?

I've also created notes within BookEnds. I like the ability to copy text from a pdf into the note stream, especially to create citations. However, I find that these notes disappear into the database and I lose track of them. Most of the 11,000 references were imported from another bibliography program, and so they have a note documenting this import. That means it makes no sense for me to search for only those references that have notes.
In addition, I've been using Scapple to create my own visual summaries of important areas of the literature. This works pretty well, but I would like to add some kind of automation. At the moment I'm simply searching for references on keyword, to try to see what I've forgotten about.
I guess my fantasy is to generate some kind of semantic network based on the keywords I've assigned in BookEnds. How do other BooksEnds users handle this kind of problem?