Best practice for non-continuous page numbering in Journals?
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2015 10:55 am
Hello all,
Quick query about what would be best:
Occasionally, a Journal article might be spread out over 2/3 sections.
In other words, starts at 33-46 – and then continues further at 89-96.
In such situations – what would the impact be of placing [33-46, 89-96] inside the [Pages] field?
Any suggestions?
Quick query about what would be best:
Occasionally, a Journal article might be spread out over 2/3 sections.
In other words, starts at 33-46 – and then continues further at 89-96.
In such situations – what would the impact be of placing [33-46, 89-96] inside the [Pages] field?
Any suggestions?