Page 1 of 1

Best practice for non-continuous page numbering in Journals?

Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2015 10:55 am
by Cassady
Hello all,

Quick query about what would be best:

Occasionally, a Journal article might be spread out over 2/3 sections.
In other words, starts at 33-46 – and then continues further at 89-96.

In such situations – what would the impact be of placing [33-46, 89-96] inside the [Pages] field?

Any suggestions?

Re: Best practice for non-continuous page numbering in Journals?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2015 7:46 am
by Jon
You can do that, but in the format just tell Bookends to output the pages (p), not the page range (p-).

Alternatively, you can put a comma after the "pages", which tells Bookends to output the field as is, i.e.

[33-46, 89-96],

Jon
Sonny Software