I have a reference type called "Edited Book Chapter", used to cite a chapter of an edited book: I use "author" field for the author and "editor" field for the book's editor/s.
When the book editors are more than 3, my required format (and common sense) says I should write only the first one and then "et al.".
Now, I could get the auto "et al." feature work in "author" field, but not in "editor". Bookends' User Guide says it "does not apply to the names of editors" (p. 124).
Is there any workaround to get this automatically done? (or perhaps I am missing something?...)
Thank you.
"et al." for editors?
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:20 am
- Location: Rome - Italy
Is that so? Is it common to have editors (of a book where you are citing a chapter by an author) truncated with et al.? And if so, does it follow the same rules as for authors (e.g. when and where et al. is inserted)? I haven't run across this before, so I'm curious as to how common it is.
Jon
Sonny Software
Jon
Sonny Software
I too think this would be a good implementation for the future. In SBL style any book with more than three authors receives 'et al' in the footnote, but all of the authors are written out in the Bib.
[footnote]John F. Oates et al., eds., Checklist of Editions of Greek and Latin Papyri, Ostraca and Tablets (4th ed.; BASPSup 7; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1992), 10.
[bib]Oates, John F., William H. Willis, Roger S. Bagnall, and Klaas A. Worp, eds. Checklist of Editions of Greek and Latin Papyri, Ostraca and Tablets. 4th ed.
[footnote]John F. Oates et al., eds., Checklist of Editions of Greek and Latin Papyri, Ostraca and Tablets (4th ed.; BASPSup 7; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1992), 10.
[bib]Oates, John F., William H. Willis, Roger S. Bagnall, and Klaas A. Worp, eds. Checklist of Editions of Greek and Latin Papyri, Ostraca and Tablets. 4th ed.
~I swore to myself that if I ever got to walk around the room as manager people would laugh as they saw me coming and applaud as I walked away~
This is true for editors and authors? What I'm getting at (all), is if the rules (where and when et al. is inserted) that apply to authors also apply to editors (when both use et al.).
Jon
Sonny Software
Jon
Sonny Software
Last edited by Jon on Tue Jan 31, 2006 11:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
At least I can say in German publications this is not unusual. And yes, it follows the same rules as for authors.Jon wrote:Is that so? Is it common to have editors (of a book where you are citing a chapter by an author) truncated with et al.? And if so, does it follow the same rules as for authors (e.g. when and where et al. is inserted)? I haven't run across this before, so I'm curious as to how common it is.
Jon
Sonny Software
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:20 am
- Location: Rome - Italy
It is also suggested in "The Chicago Manual of Style" (Chicago - London 2003), to be used when editors are more than 3.Jon wrote:Is that so? Is it common to have editors (of a book where you are citing a chapter by an author) truncated with et al.? And if so, does it follow the same rules as for authors (e.g. when and where et al. is inserted)?
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:20 am
- Location: Rome - Italy