Ambiguous references

A place for users to ask each other questions, make suggestions, and discuss Bookends.
Post Reply
bobb
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 10:01 am

Ambiguous references

Post by bobb »

I have a paper that has been passed between me and a coauthor a couple of times. The coauthor doesn't use Bookends, so that may be the source of the problem. When I do "scan document" (Word 2018), I get this:
bookends.jpg
bookends.jpg (152.49 KiB) Viewed 3133 times
I'm not sure what the problem is, but I am guessing maybe the embedded fieldcodes are corrupted?

The references that seem to be the problem are these: [Silver, 1996; Long and Silver, 2009; Long and Wirth, 2013; Di Leo et al., 2014]. If I expand the fieldcode I get about 3 pages of stuff associated with these references. However I don't know what citation "S" is being referred to, or how best to fix it.

I've been getting similar problems with other references. Do I want to remove all the references and re-add them? Has anyone encountered this before?
Jon
Site Admin
Posts: 10291
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 6:27 pm
Location: Bethesda, MD
Contact:

Re: Ambiguous references

Post by Jon »

Do they have embedded EndNote references as well (that's what gives you enormously long hidden field codes)? If so, removing them may do the trick.

Jon
Sonny Software
bobb
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 10:01 am

Re: Ambiguous references

Post by bobb »

I don't know, but that certainly could be the problem. I will strip out all of the references and re-add them. Thanks Jon.
bobb
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 10:01 am

Re: Ambiguous references

Post by bobb »

I found the problem. I have an equation embedded in my Word document that has brackets in it, which was my default citation delimiter. So I've changed the citation delimiter.
Post Reply