Hi, I'm assuming that I've got some setting incorrect - each time I try to import a .ris file it is imported "blank" - that is a new record is created but none of the fields are populated.
I have the RIS.fltr ticked in my import filter manager. These are .ris files from different sources- my institution, scopus etc.
Could someone please advise what I need to do to fix this?
Import .ris file always end up blank
Re: Import .ris file always end up blank
Can you copy a sample RIS file that doesn't work for you here so we can test?
Re: Import .ris file always end up blank
I can't attach a .ris file to the forum because it gives me an "invalid file type" message.
However, here's what the .ris files look like when opened in text edit
TY - CONF
AU - Imhof, M.P.
AU - Heemskerk, G.E.
AU - Cox, M.T.
TI - Soil information management and knowledge sharing in Victoria, Australia—user perspectives
PY - 2019
T2 - Soil Use and Management
VL - 35
IS - 1
SP - 39
EP - 51
DO - 10.1111/sum.12471
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.ur ... 032ddeed2e
AB - For twenty-one years, soil information and knowledge in Victoria, Australia has been shared via the Victorian Resources Online (VRO) website. VRO has been the primary online repository for soil and landscape information generated from land resource assessment studies, field days, training workshops, and the visualization and animation of soil and landscape processes. User surveys and qualitative feedback have highlighted the value of online soil information to users, with many considering it a useful “tool of trade,” particularly those involved in agricultural research, extension, planning and education. An extensive series of “Healthy Soils” training workshops (2007–2010) focused on topics such as “soil types and structure,” “soil chemical testing,” “soil biology,” “soil erosion” and “organic matter.” Evaluation has demonstrated their usefulness and relevance, with learning outcomes achieved by >80% of overall participants, many of whom planned to make better management decisions and change management practices on-farm. The information and knowledge generated through the series of workshops remains a valuable online resource. The development of more sophisticated knowledge visualization tools, such as animations, has broadened the potential audience for soil-related information. Analytical profiling of VRO users in recent years has highlighted it as a source of information and knowledge for a local, national and international audience. This supports the notion that increasing access to public-sector data and information provides significant benefits. Lessons learnt from enduring programs such as VRO can inform future information and knowledge management initiatives. © 2018 British Society of Soil Science
KW - communication
KW - information management
KW - knowledge management
KW - online
KW - user evaluation
KW - visualization
KW - Australia
KW - Victoria [Australia]
KW - agricultural research
KW - communication network
KW - information management
KW - Internet
KW - knowledge
KW - management practice
KW - resource assessment
KW - soil management
KW - visualization
M3 - Conference paper
DB - Scopus
N1 - Export Date: 12 July 2023; Cited By: 4
ER -
TY - CONF
AU - Andersson, K.O.
AU - Orgill, S.E.
TI - Soil extension needs to be a continuum of learning; soil workshop reflections 10 years on
PY - 2019
T2 - Soil Use and Management
VL - 35
IS - 1
SP - 117
EP - 127
DO - 10.1111/sum.12486
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.ur ... d87a7fcebe
AB - Effective extension of soil research builds landholder capacity to manage soils productively and sustainably. Government-funded extension programmes also aim to improve the state of the environment through efficient use of resources and mitigating or preventing further land degradation. To these ends, a soil extension programme aimed at farmers in south-eastern Australia was conducted during 2005–2008. The programme was designed to equip landholders with the knowledge, skills and confidence to diagnose and address soil constraints, as well as compile spatial information on soil properties. The programme involved four workshops that covered agricultural productivity, soil management and potential off-site impacts. Workshops were held on-farm and involved discussion, theory supported with practical exercises, and field visits. More than 1,400 participants were provided with subsidized soil tests to encourage soil monitoring and underpin the workshop theory on land capability and soil constraints (e.g., soil acidity, sodicity, salinity, nutrient decline and toxicities). Prior to the course, most participants did not regularly soil test so training on monitoring protocols was provided. The soil data indicated considerable phosphorus deficiencies, low organic carbon levels, and acidity across both cropping and pasture systems. Participant knowledge and land management intentions were tracked throughout the workshop series using surveys. The surveys identified a positive shift in the knowledge, understanding and confidence of most participants. However, a follow-up survey 10 years later indicated that these changes may not have been broadly sustained. Based on our study, we recommend continued engagement of landholders along a learning pathway to maximize investment in soil extension. © 2019 British Society of Soil Science
KW - catchment health
KW - farmer education
KW - organic carbon
KW - phosphorus
KW - soil acidity
KW - soil condition
KW - Australia
KW - acidity
KW - arable land
KW - catchment
KW - farmers knowledge
KW - knowledge
KW - learning
KW - organic carbon
KW - pasture
KW - phosphorus
KW - soil analysis
KW - soil management
KW - soil test
M3 - Conference paper
DB - Scopus
N1 - Export Date: 12 July 2023; Cited By: 6
ER -
TY - JOUR
AU - Zhang, A.
AU - Hochman, Z.
AU - Horan, H.
AU - Navarro, J.G.
AU - Das, B.T.
AU - Waldner, F.
TI - Socio-psychological and management drivers explain farm level wheat yield gaps in Australia
PY - 2019
T2 - Agronomy for Sustainable Development
VL - 39
IS - 1
C7 - 10
DO - 10.1007/s13593-019-0556-4
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.ur ... f3b7d03760
AB - Achieving sustainable global food security for a rapidly growing world population is one of the greatest challenges of our time. Producing more food efficiently by closing the yield gaps is regarded as a promising solution to address this challenge without further expanding farming land. However, there is limited understanding of the causes contributing to yield gaps. The present study aimed to comprehensively examine three dimensions of the causes for the wheat yield gaps in Australia: farm management practices, farm characteristics and grower characteristics. Computer-assisted telephone interviews of 232 wheat producers from 14 contrasting local areas were conducted. The data collected on these three dimensions were used to develop a comprehensive framework to understand causes of yield gaps. Results reveal significant differences between farms with smaller yield gaps and those with greater yield gaps in relation to farming management as well as farm and grower characteristics. Findings further underline that farms with smaller yield gaps are likely to be smaller holdings growing less wheat on more favourable soil types, are more likely to apply more N fertiliser, to have a greater crop diversity, to soil-test a greater proportion of their fields, to have fewer resistant weeds, to adopt new technologies, and are less likely to grow wheat following either cereal crops or a pasture. They are more likely to use and trust a fee-for-service agronomist, and have a university education. The dynamic relationships between grower characteristics and farm management practices in causing yield gaps are further highlighted through a path analysis. This study is the first to demonstrate that yield gaps are the result of the intertwined dynamics between biophysical factors, grower socio-psychological characteristics and farm management practices. Socio-psychological factors not only directly contribute to yield gaps, but they also influence farm management practices that in turn contribute to yield gaps. Our findings suggest that, to close wheat yield gaps, it is important to develop integrated strategies that address both socio-psychological and farm management dimensions. © 2019, INRA and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
KW - Consulting services
KW - Crop management
KW - Crop rotation
KW - Nitrogen fertiliser
KW - Soil type
KW - Technology adoption
KW - Wheat
KW - Australia
KW - Triticum aestivum
KW - agricultural management
KW - agricultural technology
KW - crop rotation
KW - fertilizer application
KW - food security
KW - nitrogen compound
KW - psychology
KW - soil type
KW - technology adoption
KW - wheat
KW - yield response
M3 - Article
DB - Scopus
N1 - Export Date: 12 July 2023; Cited By: 13
ER -
and here is my RIS filter as text
{"version":1504,"authors":"AU,A1","title":"TI,T1,BT,RI","editors":"ED,A2,A3","journal":"JF,JO,JA,J1,J2,T3,T2","volume":"VL,CP","pages":"SP,EP","thedate":"PY,Y1","publisher":"PB","location":"AD,CY","url":"UR","title2":"","user1":"U1","user2":"U2","abstract":"AB,N2","keywords":"KW","notes":"AV,M2,RP,U3,U4,U5,L1,Y2,N1","user3":"","user4":"","issue":"IS","type":"TY","ignoreText":"","user5":"CN","user6":"SN","user7":"","user8":"","user9":"","user10":"","user11":"","user12":"","user13":"","user14":"M1","user15":"","user16":"","user17":"M3,DO","user18":"","user19":"","user20":"","attachments":"L1","refsStartWithFieldText":"TY","RemoveTheseCharsFieldText":"","NotesFieldText":"For Zotero exports, the L1 tag in front of Notes allows import of pdf attachments into Bookends.\r\rT2 is secondary title, and for some exporters should be added as a Vol(Issue) tag. Zotero uses T2 for journal names.","sepNamesByFieldText":"CR","sepKeywordsByFieldText":",","consecutiveTagsCheckBoxValue":false,"ignoreLeadingSpacesCheckBoxValue":false,"parseAuthorsEditorsCheckBoxValue":true,"dehyphenAuthorsEditorsCheckBoxValue":false,"dehyphenJournalCheckBoxValue":false,"dehyphenKeywordsCheckBoxValue":false,"anyCharButtonValue":false,"numOfCapLettersButtonValue":true,"columnNumPopupListIndex":0,"capLetterNumPopupListIndex":1,"nameOrderPopupListIndex":0,"SO1TagText":"","SO1FieldText0":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex0":0,"SO1FieldText1":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex1":0,"SO1FieldText2":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex2":0,"SO1FieldText3":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex3":0,"SO1FieldText4":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex4":0,"SO1FieldText5":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex5":0,"SO1FieldText6":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex6":0,"SO1FieldText7":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex7":0,"SO1FieldText8":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex8":0,"SO1FieldText9":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex9":0,"SO1FieldText10":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex10":0,"SO1FieldText11":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex11":0,"SO1FieldText12":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex12":0,"SO1FieldText13":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex13":0,"SO1FieldText14":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex14":0,"SO2TagText":"","SO2FieldText15":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex15":0,"SO2FieldText16":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex16":0,"SO2FieldText17":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex17":0,"SO2FieldText18":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex18":0,"SO2FieldText19":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex19":0,"SO2FieldText20":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex20":0,"SO2FieldText21":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex21":0,"SO2FieldText22":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex22":0,"SO2FieldText23":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex23":0,"SO2FieldText24":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex24":0,"SO2FieldText25":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex25":0,"SO2FieldText26":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex26":0,"SO2FieldText27":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex27":0,"SO2FieldText28":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex28":0,"SO2FieldText29":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex29":0,"firstAndLastNameSepPopupListindex":1,"ReferTagBtnValue":false,"InsertWhatPopupListindex0":0,"InsertTextFieldText0":"","fieldNamesPopupListindex0":0,"InsertWhatPopupListindex1":0,"InsertTextFieldText1":"","fieldNamesPopupListindex1":0,"EnableMARCBoxValue":true,"MARCSubFieldDelimiterText":"","MARCDataBeginsInColumntext":"","defaultTypePopupListIndex":9,"EnableInternetSearchValue":false,"HostFieldText":"","GatewayPopupListIndex":-1,"ServerAddressFieldText":"","ServerPortFieldText":"","DatabaseNameFieldText":"","RecordSyntaxPopupListindex":0,"RecordDisplayPopupListIndex":0,"numOfMARCFields":17,"MARCFieldSearchText0":"","MARCFieldSearchText1":"","MARCFieldSearchText2":"","MARCFieldSearchText3":"","MARCFieldSearchText4":"","MARCFieldSearchText5":"","MARCFieldSearchText6":"","MARCFieldSearchText7":"","MARCFieldSearchText8":"","MARCFieldSearchText9":"","MARCFieldSearchText10":"","MARCFieldSearchText11":"","MARCFieldSearchText12":"","MARCFieldSearchText13":"","MARCFieldSearchText14":"","MARCFieldSearchText15":"","MARCFieldSearchText16":"","MARCFieldSearchText17":"","BooleanSearchCheckboxValue":false,"UserIDCheckboxValue":false,"userIDFieldText":"","passwordFieldText":"","textEncodingPopupRowTag":"ANSEL","NotesField2Text":"","typeDefinitionArray":["ART","ADVS","BOOK","CHAP","CONF","THES","","","INPR","JOUR","","MAP","NEWS","PAT","PCOMM","","","GEN","BILL","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","",""],"XMLSearch":"<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?><Searches></Searches>"}
However, here's what the .ris files look like when opened in text edit
TY - CONF
AU - Imhof, M.P.
AU - Heemskerk, G.E.
AU - Cox, M.T.
TI - Soil information management and knowledge sharing in Victoria, Australia—user perspectives
PY - 2019
T2 - Soil Use and Management
VL - 35
IS - 1
SP - 39
EP - 51
DO - 10.1111/sum.12471
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.ur ... 032ddeed2e
AB - For twenty-one years, soil information and knowledge in Victoria, Australia has been shared via the Victorian Resources Online (VRO) website. VRO has been the primary online repository for soil and landscape information generated from land resource assessment studies, field days, training workshops, and the visualization and animation of soil and landscape processes. User surveys and qualitative feedback have highlighted the value of online soil information to users, with many considering it a useful “tool of trade,” particularly those involved in agricultural research, extension, planning and education. An extensive series of “Healthy Soils” training workshops (2007–2010) focused on topics such as “soil types and structure,” “soil chemical testing,” “soil biology,” “soil erosion” and “organic matter.” Evaluation has demonstrated their usefulness and relevance, with learning outcomes achieved by >80% of overall participants, many of whom planned to make better management decisions and change management practices on-farm. The information and knowledge generated through the series of workshops remains a valuable online resource. The development of more sophisticated knowledge visualization tools, such as animations, has broadened the potential audience for soil-related information. Analytical profiling of VRO users in recent years has highlighted it as a source of information and knowledge for a local, national and international audience. This supports the notion that increasing access to public-sector data and information provides significant benefits. Lessons learnt from enduring programs such as VRO can inform future information and knowledge management initiatives. © 2018 British Society of Soil Science
KW - communication
KW - information management
KW - knowledge management
KW - online
KW - user evaluation
KW - visualization
KW - Australia
KW - Victoria [Australia]
KW - agricultural research
KW - communication network
KW - information management
KW - Internet
KW - knowledge
KW - management practice
KW - resource assessment
KW - soil management
KW - visualization
M3 - Conference paper
DB - Scopus
N1 - Export Date: 12 July 2023; Cited By: 4
ER -
TY - CONF
AU - Andersson, K.O.
AU - Orgill, S.E.
TI - Soil extension needs to be a continuum of learning; soil workshop reflections 10 years on
PY - 2019
T2 - Soil Use and Management
VL - 35
IS - 1
SP - 117
EP - 127
DO - 10.1111/sum.12486
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.ur ... d87a7fcebe
AB - Effective extension of soil research builds landholder capacity to manage soils productively and sustainably. Government-funded extension programmes also aim to improve the state of the environment through efficient use of resources and mitigating or preventing further land degradation. To these ends, a soil extension programme aimed at farmers in south-eastern Australia was conducted during 2005–2008. The programme was designed to equip landholders with the knowledge, skills and confidence to diagnose and address soil constraints, as well as compile spatial information on soil properties. The programme involved four workshops that covered agricultural productivity, soil management and potential off-site impacts. Workshops were held on-farm and involved discussion, theory supported with practical exercises, and field visits. More than 1,400 participants were provided with subsidized soil tests to encourage soil monitoring and underpin the workshop theory on land capability and soil constraints (e.g., soil acidity, sodicity, salinity, nutrient decline and toxicities). Prior to the course, most participants did not regularly soil test so training on monitoring protocols was provided. The soil data indicated considerable phosphorus deficiencies, low organic carbon levels, and acidity across both cropping and pasture systems. Participant knowledge and land management intentions were tracked throughout the workshop series using surveys. The surveys identified a positive shift in the knowledge, understanding and confidence of most participants. However, a follow-up survey 10 years later indicated that these changes may not have been broadly sustained. Based on our study, we recommend continued engagement of landholders along a learning pathway to maximize investment in soil extension. © 2019 British Society of Soil Science
KW - catchment health
KW - farmer education
KW - organic carbon
KW - phosphorus
KW - soil acidity
KW - soil condition
KW - Australia
KW - acidity
KW - arable land
KW - catchment
KW - farmers knowledge
KW - knowledge
KW - learning
KW - organic carbon
KW - pasture
KW - phosphorus
KW - soil analysis
KW - soil management
KW - soil test
M3 - Conference paper
DB - Scopus
N1 - Export Date: 12 July 2023; Cited By: 6
ER -
TY - JOUR
AU - Zhang, A.
AU - Hochman, Z.
AU - Horan, H.
AU - Navarro, J.G.
AU - Das, B.T.
AU - Waldner, F.
TI - Socio-psychological and management drivers explain farm level wheat yield gaps in Australia
PY - 2019
T2 - Agronomy for Sustainable Development
VL - 39
IS - 1
C7 - 10
DO - 10.1007/s13593-019-0556-4
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.ur ... f3b7d03760
AB - Achieving sustainable global food security for a rapidly growing world population is one of the greatest challenges of our time. Producing more food efficiently by closing the yield gaps is regarded as a promising solution to address this challenge without further expanding farming land. However, there is limited understanding of the causes contributing to yield gaps. The present study aimed to comprehensively examine three dimensions of the causes for the wheat yield gaps in Australia: farm management practices, farm characteristics and grower characteristics. Computer-assisted telephone interviews of 232 wheat producers from 14 contrasting local areas were conducted. The data collected on these three dimensions were used to develop a comprehensive framework to understand causes of yield gaps. Results reveal significant differences between farms with smaller yield gaps and those with greater yield gaps in relation to farming management as well as farm and grower characteristics. Findings further underline that farms with smaller yield gaps are likely to be smaller holdings growing less wheat on more favourable soil types, are more likely to apply more N fertiliser, to have a greater crop diversity, to soil-test a greater proportion of their fields, to have fewer resistant weeds, to adopt new technologies, and are less likely to grow wheat following either cereal crops or a pasture. They are more likely to use and trust a fee-for-service agronomist, and have a university education. The dynamic relationships between grower characteristics and farm management practices in causing yield gaps are further highlighted through a path analysis. This study is the first to demonstrate that yield gaps are the result of the intertwined dynamics between biophysical factors, grower socio-psychological characteristics and farm management practices. Socio-psychological factors not only directly contribute to yield gaps, but they also influence farm management practices that in turn contribute to yield gaps. Our findings suggest that, to close wheat yield gaps, it is important to develop integrated strategies that address both socio-psychological and farm management dimensions. © 2019, INRA and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
KW - Consulting services
KW - Crop management
KW - Crop rotation
KW - Nitrogen fertiliser
KW - Soil type
KW - Technology adoption
KW - Wheat
KW - Australia
KW - Triticum aestivum
KW - agricultural management
KW - agricultural technology
KW - crop rotation
KW - fertilizer application
KW - food security
KW - nitrogen compound
KW - psychology
KW - soil type
KW - technology adoption
KW - wheat
KW - yield response
M3 - Article
DB - Scopus
N1 - Export Date: 12 July 2023; Cited By: 13
ER -
and here is my RIS filter as text
{"version":1504,"authors":"AU,A1","title":"TI,T1,BT,RI","editors":"ED,A2,A3","journal":"JF,JO,JA,J1,J2,T3,T2","volume":"VL,CP","pages":"SP,EP","thedate":"PY,Y1","publisher":"PB","location":"AD,CY","url":"UR","title2":"","user1":"U1","user2":"U2","abstract":"AB,N2","keywords":"KW","notes":"AV,M2,RP,U3,U4,U5,L1,Y2,N1","user3":"","user4":"","issue":"IS","type":"TY","ignoreText":"","user5":"CN","user6":"SN","user7":"","user8":"","user9":"","user10":"","user11":"","user12":"","user13":"","user14":"M1","user15":"","user16":"","user17":"M3,DO","user18":"","user19":"","user20":"","attachments":"L1","refsStartWithFieldText":"TY","RemoveTheseCharsFieldText":"","NotesFieldText":"For Zotero exports, the L1 tag in front of Notes allows import of pdf attachments into Bookends.\r\rT2 is secondary title, and for some exporters should be added as a Vol(Issue) tag. Zotero uses T2 for journal names.","sepNamesByFieldText":"CR","sepKeywordsByFieldText":",","consecutiveTagsCheckBoxValue":false,"ignoreLeadingSpacesCheckBoxValue":false,"parseAuthorsEditorsCheckBoxValue":true,"dehyphenAuthorsEditorsCheckBoxValue":false,"dehyphenJournalCheckBoxValue":false,"dehyphenKeywordsCheckBoxValue":false,"anyCharButtonValue":false,"numOfCapLettersButtonValue":true,"columnNumPopupListIndex":0,"capLetterNumPopupListIndex":1,"nameOrderPopupListIndex":0,"SO1TagText":"","SO1FieldText0":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex0":0,"SO1FieldText1":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex1":0,"SO1FieldText2":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex2":0,"SO1FieldText3":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex3":0,"SO1FieldText4":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex4":0,"SO1FieldText5":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex5":0,"SO1FieldText6":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex6":0,"SO1FieldText7":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex7":0,"SO1FieldText8":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex8":0,"SO1FieldText9":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex9":0,"SO1FieldText10":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex10":0,"SO1FieldText11":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex11":0,"SO1FieldText12":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex12":0,"SO1FieldText13":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex13":0,"SO1FieldText14":"","SO1IntoFieldListindex14":0,"SO2TagText":"","SO2FieldText15":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex15":0,"SO2FieldText16":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex16":0,"SO2FieldText17":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex17":0,"SO2FieldText18":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex18":0,"SO2FieldText19":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex19":0,"SO2FieldText20":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex20":0,"SO2FieldText21":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex21":0,"SO2FieldText22":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex22":0,"SO2FieldText23":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex23":0,"SO2FieldText24":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex24":0,"SO2FieldText25":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex25":0,"SO2FieldText26":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex26":0,"SO2FieldText27":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex27":0,"SO2FieldText28":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex28":0,"SO2FieldText29":"","SO2IntoFieldListIndex29":0,"firstAndLastNameSepPopupListindex":1,"ReferTagBtnValue":false,"InsertWhatPopupListindex0":0,"InsertTextFieldText0":"","fieldNamesPopupListindex0":0,"InsertWhatPopupListindex1":0,"InsertTextFieldText1":"","fieldNamesPopupListindex1":0,"EnableMARCBoxValue":true,"MARCSubFieldDelimiterText":"","MARCDataBeginsInColumntext":"","defaultTypePopupListIndex":9,"EnableInternetSearchValue":false,"HostFieldText":"","GatewayPopupListIndex":-1,"ServerAddressFieldText":"","ServerPortFieldText":"","DatabaseNameFieldText":"","RecordSyntaxPopupListindex":0,"RecordDisplayPopupListIndex":0,"numOfMARCFields":17,"MARCFieldSearchText0":"","MARCFieldSearchText1":"","MARCFieldSearchText2":"","MARCFieldSearchText3":"","MARCFieldSearchText4":"","MARCFieldSearchText5":"","MARCFieldSearchText6":"","MARCFieldSearchText7":"","MARCFieldSearchText8":"","MARCFieldSearchText9":"","MARCFieldSearchText10":"","MARCFieldSearchText11":"","MARCFieldSearchText12":"","MARCFieldSearchText13":"","MARCFieldSearchText14":"","MARCFieldSearchText15":"","MARCFieldSearchText16":"","MARCFieldSearchText17":"","BooleanSearchCheckboxValue":false,"UserIDCheckboxValue":false,"userIDFieldText":"","passwordFieldText":"","textEncodingPopupRowTag":"ANSEL","NotesField2Text":"","typeDefinitionArray":["ART","ADVS","BOOK","CHAP","CONF","THES","","","INPR","JOUR","","MAP","NEWS","PAT","PCOMM","","","GEN","BILL","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","","",""],"XMLSearch":"<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?><Searches></Searches>"}
Re: Import .ris file always end up blank
I copied the RIS text to the clipboard and imported into Bookends from the clipboard without a problem -- 3 references imported. Please try that yourself. If it still doesn't work for you, try with a fresh new empty library. Finally, if you can import from the clipboard but not the file, please send me that file so I can take a look at it.
Jon
Sonny Software
Jon
Sonny Software
Re: Import .ris file always end up blank
I copied your RIS entries to a file and they also import for me just fine (the URLs are broken but that is probably an issue with the forum using ... to shorten the URL...