question marks

A place for users to ask each other questions, make suggestions, and discuss Bookends.
Post Reply
danzac
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 11:45 am

question marks

Post by danzac »

Can I suggest that Bookends in the final clean up for formatting replace ?. with ?

Would this cause any problems for anyone?

The reason is some titles end in a question mark, so the question mark goes into the title field. But in my format, the title field is followed by a period. This then outputs ?. at the end of my titles in my bibs.

Thanks, Danny
~I swore to myself that if I ever got to walk around the room as manager people would laugh as they saw me coming and applaud as I walked away~
Jon
Site Admin
Posts: 10291
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 6:27 pm
Location: Bethesda, MD
Contact:

Post by Jon »

Hm, Bookends should already take care of this. And it does so in the various SBL formats that I have. What is the order field of the format you using?

Jon
Sonny Software
danzac
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 11:45 am

Post by danzac »

Jon, here is my format

a.| t. ~Vol. ~u16|~ of ~u15$.$ u13~ vols.~| f v~.~`.`| ~Edited by ~e. ~Translated by ~u3*.| x~ ed.~| l: u, d. |~ Repr., ~g.|¬

Here is what is being output:
Sizer, Stephen. Christian Zionism: Roap-Map to Armageddon?. Downers Grove: IVP, 2006.

So Bookends is taking care of the period after the title, but I suspect it is not removing the period that is in the force quotes after volume. The forced period is there to show up after a full title if there is no volume number, so it can't be removed.

Hope this helps.
~I swore to myself that if I ever got to walk around the room as manager people would laugh as they saw me coming and applaud as I walked away~
Jon
Site Admin
Posts: 10291
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 6:27 pm
Location: Bethesda, MD
Contact:

Post by Jon »

That's right. I think post-processing ?. to ? should do the trick.

Jon
Sonny Software
Post Reply